2001 Rover 75 vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura EL would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1997 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1997 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura EL. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Rover 75 | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Rover | Acura |
Model | 75 | EL |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1079 kg |