2001 Rover 75 vs. 2003 TVR Speed 12
To start off, 2003 TVR Speed 12 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 7,729 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 TVR Speed 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 TVR Speed 12 (790 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 613 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 TVR Speed 12 should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 TVR Speed 12.
Because 2003 TVR Speed 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 TVR Speed 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 TVR Speed 12 (881 Nm) has 556 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (325 Nm). This means 2003 TVR Speed 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Rover 75 | 2003 TVR Speed 12 | |
Make | Rover | TVR |
Model | 75 | Speed 12 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 7729 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 790 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7750 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 881 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1000 kg |