2001 Rover 75 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Rover 75 2013 Toyota Matrix
Make Rover Toyota
Model 75 Matrix
Year Released 2001 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1951 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 260 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4365 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2600 mm