2001 Rover 75 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Rover 75 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2600 mm |