2001 Saab 05-Sep vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Saab 05-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Saab 05-Sep would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2500 (204 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2001 Saab 05-Sep. (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 2001 Saab 05-Sep.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Saab 05-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Saab 05-Sep (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2500. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Saab 05-Sep | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Saab | Mazda |
| Model | 05-Sep | B2500 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2990 mm |
