2001 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 220 kg more than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Seat Inca Kombi | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | Inca Kombi | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 415 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1255 kg |