2001 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2012 Kia Forte
To start off, 2012 Kia Forte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Forte (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Forte weights approximately 255 kg more than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Forte (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Seat Inca Kombi | 2012 Kia Forte | |
Make | Seat | Kia |
Model | Inca Kombi | Forte |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1290 kg |