2001 Skoda Fabia vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Tata E should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 2003 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Fabia (310 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2001 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata E. 2001 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 2003 Tata E has manual transmission. 2003 Tata E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Skoda Fabia | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | Skoda | Tata |
Model | Fabia | E |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2810 mm |