2001 Skoda Fabia vs. 2009 BMW 530
To start off, 2009 BMW 530 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 530 (268 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 2009 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 530 (320 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (310 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Skoda Fabia | 2009 BMW 530 | |
| Make | Skoda | BMW |
| Model | Fabia | 530 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2890 mm |
