2001 Skoda Montreux vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Montreux. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Montreux would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Montreux. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Montreux.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Montreux, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Skoda Montreux. (310 Nm). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Skoda Montreux.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Skoda Montreux | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Skoda | Suzuki |
Model | Montreux | Equator |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3560 mm |