2001 Smart ForFour vs. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Talbot Saoutchik (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 830 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Smart ForFour | 1949 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Smart | Talbot |
Model | ForFour | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2001 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1332 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3160 mm |