2001 Smart ForTwo vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Smart ForTwo | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Smart | Triumph |
Model | ForTwo | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 64 L |