2001 Subaru Forester vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2001 Subaru Forester. (137 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2001 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 166 kg more than 2001 Subaru Forester. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Outback (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Subaru Forester. (186 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Subaru Forester | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Subaru | Subaru |
Model | Forester | Outback |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1536 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |