2001 Subaru HM-01 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Subaru HM-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Subaru HM-01 would be higher. Both 2001 Subaru HM-01 and 2003 Subaru R2 are equipped with a 658 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2001 Subaru HM-01. (45 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 2001 Subaru HM-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Subaru HM-01 weights approximately 675 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Subaru HM-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Subaru HM-01. (57 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Subaru HM-01.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Subaru HM-01 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Subaru | Subaru |
Model | HM-01 | R2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2370 mm |