2001 Subaru Outback vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 240. 2001 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Subaru Outback | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Subaru | Volvo |
| Model | Outback | 240 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Torque | 282 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.2 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |
