2001 Suzuki Covie vs. 1968 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,327 cc, 2001 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki Covie (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Suzuki Covie | 1968 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
| Model | Covie | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1327 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 53 L |
