2001 Suzuki Covie vs. 1983 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Celica weights approximately 360 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications: