2001 Suzuki Covie vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 518 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Suzuki Covie | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
Model | Covie | Cube |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1327 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |