2001 Suzuki Covie vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1410 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Suzuki Covie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Suzuki Covie | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Covie | Highlander |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1327 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4796 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |
