2001 Suzuki SX vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 44 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Suzuki SX | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Suzuki | Acura |
| Model | SX | CL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 3210 cc |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |
