2001 Suzuki SX vs. 2010 Lada Niva

To start off, 2010 Lada Niva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki SX (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki SX weights approximately 251 kg more than 2010 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Suzuki SX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lada Niva (128 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2010 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX. 2001 Suzuki SX has automatic transmission and 2010 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 2010 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Suzuki SX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: