2001 Toyota Celica vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 387 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (374 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Celica | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Celica | Z |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 374 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 11:01:00 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |