2001 Toyota Condor vs. 1978 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Condor (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 320 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Condor (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Condor | 1978 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Toyota | Zastava |
Model | Condor | 1500 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1040 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2430 mm |