2001 Toyota HMV vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2001 Toyota HMV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Toyota HMV. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota HMV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota HMV weights approximately 33 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota HMV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota HMV. (280 Nm). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota HMV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota HMV | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Toyota | Jeep |
| Model | HMV | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 1648 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |
