2001 Toyota HMV vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota HMV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota HMV would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota HMV (202 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Volvo C70. (197 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota HMV should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota HMV weights approximately 105 kg more than 2004 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota HMV (280 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo C70. (270 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota HMV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota HMV | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | HMV | C70 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 1576 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
