2001 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,981 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser (161 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 730 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser (343 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Land Cruiser | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Land Cruiser | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2981 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |