2001 Toyota Mark II vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 275 kg more than 2001 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Mark II | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Mark II | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |