2001 Toyota RSC vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RSC (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 264. (149 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 264. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 24 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 264. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota RSC (284 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 264. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota RSC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota RSC | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | RSC | 264 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1396 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2650 mm |
