2001 Toyota RSC vs. 2013 GMC Savana

To start off, 2013 GMC Savana is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota RSC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota RSC would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Savana (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RSC. (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RSC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Savana weights approximately 835 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 GMC Savana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Savana (352 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota RSC. (284 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota RSC. 2013 GMC Savana has automatic transmission and 2001 Toyota RSC has manual transmission. 2001 Toyota RSC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 GMC Savana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: