2001 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2012 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Sequoia. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Sequoia.

Because 2001 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Sequoia (430 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2001 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: