2001 Toyota Sienna vs. 1982 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2001 Toyota Sienna is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Sienna (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 745 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Sienna (280 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500. 2001 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: