2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (80 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Tundra | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
