2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (35 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Tundra | Herald |
Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 69 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |