2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (23 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (44 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Toyota | ZAZ |
Model | Tundra | Jalta |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 44 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2030 mm |