2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Tundra | 145 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2620 mm |
