2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300. 2001 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Toyota | Zastava |
| Model | Tundra | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2430 mm |
