2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Tundra | 626 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2520 mm |