2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1983 Triumph Acclaim
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1983 Triumph Acclaim. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1983 Triumph Acclaim.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Triumph Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Triumph Acclaim. (245 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Triumph Acclaim.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1983 Triumph Acclaim | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Tundra | Acclaim |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2330 mm |
