2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1986 Holden Barina
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Barina would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1986 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Barina.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Barina. (104 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 1986 Holden Barina | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Tundra | Barina |
Year Released | 2001 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 104 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2250 mm |