2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1992 BMW 850
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 850 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 850 (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 850 (450 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 1992 BMW 850 | |
Make | Toyota | BMW |
Model | Tundra | 850 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 52 L |