2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2000 Honda Capa
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda Capa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda Capa would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2000 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Capa.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Capa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda Capa. (136 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda Capa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 2000 Honda Capa | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Tundra | Capa |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2370 mm |
