2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2003 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2003 Seat Alhambra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Seat Alhambra. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Alhambra.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Alhambra. (214 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Alhambra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2003 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Toyota | Seat |
Model | Tundra | Alhambra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |