2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Tundra | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 3010 mm |