2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (300 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hummer H3 (434 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Hummer |
| Model | Tundra | H3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2170 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 87 L |
