2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Toyota | Lincoln |
| Model | Tundra | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 494 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5672 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1989 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 3327 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 127 L |
