2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (361 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Toyota | Saturn |
Model | Tundra | Outlook |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 83 L |