2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2011 Acura RDX
To start off, 2011 Acura RDX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Acura RDX. (240 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2011 Acura RDX.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura RDX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Acura RDX. (352 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Acura RDX.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2011 Acura RDX | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | Tundra | RDX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |