2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Bentley Continental GT
To start off, 2012 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Bentley Continental GT (567 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2012 Bentley Continental GT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Bentley Continental GT (700 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2012 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Bentley Continental GT | |
Make | Toyota | Bentley |
Model | Tundra | Continental GT |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 567 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 700 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1943 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2746 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 91 L |