2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Toyota | Jaguar |
Model | Tundra | XF |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |