2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Toyota | Lotus |
| Model | Tundra | Evora |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
