2001 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1173 kg more than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 ZAZ Wagon | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | ZAZ | Volvo |
Model | Wagon | XC60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2774 mm |